A. Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. Plagiarism means using someone else’s words or ideas in your submitted assessment without proper acknowledgement.
A. Yes. At the University of Sydney successful completion of the AHEM is mandatory for new students. If you don’t complete the module before the deadline you may not be able to access your academic results.
A. Reusing or ‘recycling’ a previously submitted assignment (or parts of that assignment) is a form of academic dishonesty because a new assessment task requires you to do new or original work. In a few cases you may be permitted to reuse previously submitted work but you need your unit coordinator’s written permission.
A. No. Your unit coordinator is not the decision-maker in resolving an allegation of academic dishonesty, so they are not able to influence the decision or withdraw the allegation.
A. You may respond in person or in writing. We recommend that you be honest and open with the faculty. For example, if you made honest mistakes with referencing you should admit this and explain the reasons for the errors.
A. Some people prefer having the time to construct a considered written response and not having to deal with the stress of a real-time interview with the Education Integrity Coordinator (EIC). Others prefer a face-to-face meeting because they want the possibility of explaining some part of their response that a written response cannot do. If you have any kind of support documentation to support your response, we recommend you present it to the faculty. Whichever type of response you choose, be aware that a written response will always have a shorter deadline. You can request assistance from SUPRA with both types of responses.
A. If you are overseas and prefer a face-to-face meeting you can request another meeting date, or a Zoom meeting. It will be up to the faculty to approve.
A. Yes. This document will show you the parts of the submitted work that the faculty is investigating and will help you to properly structure your response.
A. The EIC will want to properly understand if there has been a breach of the University’s Academic Honesty in Coursework Policy or not. The usual initial questions will be something like, ‘Do you understand the allegation?’ followed by ‘Tell me what you think happened’. If your response is not clear they will ask further questions to help them understand your explanation and decide whether you have breached the policy.
A. In many cases a decision is made at the end of the interview and you will be provided with an outcome letter which should also inform you of your right to appeal and the deadline. In some faculties where a decision is made at the interview you may be asked to sign the decision letter to acknowledge that you have received it. Signing does not mean you agree with the outcome or penalty. You will be provided with a copy to take with you. A formal outcome letter will be emailed to you. If the EIC requires more time to make a decision they will inform you at the end of the meeting.
A. You have a right to appeal the outcome or the penalty. Read our article on academic appeals.
A. No. However, students in certain degrees should be aware that being admitted to practice in some professions will ask you to disclose any previous integrity breaches, which may include academic dishonesty matters. The University will not disclose this information.
A. Read our article on academic dishonesty and plagiarism.
A. If, after reflecting on the allegation and the evidence, you conclude you have engaged in academic dishonesty or plagiarism, even if you did not intend to do so, we recommend you accept the allegation and provide your explanation. The outcome and penalty should be consistent with the University’s Educational Integrity Decision-Making and Penalty Guidelines 2018.
A. Any matter that is escalated beyond the faculty level will take longer to resolve. The Registrar has up to 10 days to consider the matter before deciding to either proceed to investigation; send back to the faculty to resolve under the academic honesty policy; issue a warning; or do nothing. If the matter is considered possible misconduct it will proceed to investigation and the process will likely take at least several weeks.
A. If you are required to respond to an allegation of possible misconduct you will not be able to graduate until the matter is resolved. This is because if the outcome is misconduct, a penalty could be a fail grade, or other similar penalty requiring you to re-do a unit of study in your degree. You may appeal the outcome and penalty but an appeal will take at least several weeks to resolve. If you receive a notification of possible misconduct after completion of your degree, and even after receiving a letter of completion or invitation to your graduation ceremony, we recommend you contact us for assistance. It is likely that you need to apply for a new visa, especially if you deny the allegation. SUPRA has Registered Migration agents who can assist you with this.
A. Accepting the allegation means also accepting the likely penalty or range of penalties set out in the notification. In this case the penalty is likely to be one of the more lenient ones in the range but may also depend on the circumstances and type of misconduct. We recommend you contact us for assistance.
A. Yes. The faculty or university can investigate any previous assessment you submitted for grading, including group work assessments.
A. The key types of evidence that support your claim to have completed the assessment on your own include: your drafts leading up to the final submission; notes written about source materials and various readings that show your original thinking about the subject; and your plan to use the material in your assignment.
A. At the University, an individual assessment means you are expected to formulate and write the assignment on your own. Your submitted assignment must contain ideas and wording that are original to you, or correctly referenced, otherwise Turnitin will pick up on a high level of similarity, and you and your friend may receive an allegation notification. Only a group work assignment allows you to share ideas and write collaboratively with other students.
A. Yes. Failure to respond to an allegation may result in a finding against you because you decided to not provide your side of the story. The faculty must consider each group member’s response separately. Contact us for assistance.
A. Yes. However, anyone who checks your assignment must only correct grammar and provide general feedback on the structure of the written work – such as identifying referencing errors, or lack of clarity in answering the question.
A. Yes. Any content in your essay that is not your original idea and written by you must be referenced. Even if you translated and paraphrased the content, you still need to reference the source. This includes content from anywhere on the internet, in any language, and in any form. If you are not sure how to correctly reference this content, contact your unit coordinator or register for an individual consultation with the Learning Hub.
A. No. SUPRA caseworkers can assist you in understanding the allegation, advising on support documents, and reviewing your written response.
A. No. Contact us for assistance. Our caseworkers have deep experience and knowledge of the University’s policies and procedures, and our service is free to students.
A. In this situation we strongly recommend that you contact us for assistance before responding to the allegation.
Download this article as a Word document
Download this article as a PDF
Last updated June 2022.
Stay in touch with us